SELF-ENTREPRENEURS AND THE INTERNS: ATYPICAL JOBS GENERATORS OF "FLEXICARITY"?
Keywords:
Flexibility, precarity, bogus ‘self-employment’, “Uberization” of jobs.Abstract
The 2013 National Interprofessional Agreement (ANI) highlighted the importance of the issues
surrounding atypical employment induced by the simultaneous search of flexibility and job security
for individuals; ie “flexicurity”, according to that neologism invented ten years ago.
By atypical jobs, we mean jobs that are contrary to standard employment contract that is the unfixed
term contract; full time; exercised in the premises of the employer. For instance, part-time work,
fixed term contract and temporary work, to name the best known and most widely used atypical
jobs (which concentrate about 75 % of all atypical jobs).
However, alongside these, there are other forms of atypical employment including selfentrepreneurship and internship. Yet, these two situations are not carried out within a job
relationship. Neither the entrepreneur nor the trainee has an employment contract in the legal sense
of the term. However, the use of self-entrepreneurs and trainees constitute sources of flexibility for
companies. But do these status provide security for the individuals concerned ? The success of the
enrollment system of self-entrepreneurship and the large number of trainees deserve interest, all the
more so as they are sometimes used instead of regular employees


