DÉCRIRE LES COMPORTEMENTS RESPONSABLES FACE AU HARCÈLEMENT MORAL: APPORTS ET LIMITES DU CADRE DESCRIPTIF DE LA THÉORIE DES PARTIES PRENANTES

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which stakeholder theory can account for
taking into account the suffering in situations of harassment at work. It relies on
a sample of twenty-five cases of people confronted with a case of harassment. Noting the
limits of stakeholder theory in its understanding of suffering in situations of violence at work, the authors mobilize the contributions of Levinas' moral philosophy.
The results show on the one hand the existence of a sudden realization of the weakness of
people involved in the conflict, beyond pursuing the interests that fuel the conflict. This
result is then discussed in the light of work on violence at work and its trivialization.