Publication Ethics
It is necessary to agree on standards of ethical behavior expected of all parties involved in the act of publication: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, and the publisher.
Publication decisions
The Editor-in-Chief of Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines will be responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal will be published. The Editor may be guided by the policies of the Review's Editorial Board and constrained by applicable legal requirements regarding copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may consult other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair game
An editor will evaluate manuscripts for intellectual content without regard to the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnicity, citizenship , or political philosophy.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Policy
The Journal “Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, is committed to diversity, equity and inclusion. We seek to work with scholars from a range of institutional affiliations, nationalities, national origins, sexes, sexual orientation, disabilities, ages, or other individual status, and career stages.
Confidentiality
The editor and editorial staff of Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines will not disclose any information regarding a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate. applicable.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript will not be used in research by an editorial board or editor without the written consent of the author.
Inside information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with the authors, companies, or institutions related to the articles.
Duties of reviewers
Contribution to editorial decisions
Peer review helps the editor make editorial decisions and , through editorial communications with the author, can also help the author improve the paper.
Speed
Any selected reviewer who feels incompetent to evaluate the research reported in a manuscript or knows that timely review will be impossible should inform the editor and recuse themselves from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscript received for review should be treated as a confidential document. They should not be shown or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.
Standards of objectivity
Reviews must be carried out objectively. The author's personal criticism is inappropriate. Reviewers should clearly express their opinions with supporting arguments.
Source recognition
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement, indicating that an observation, derivation or argument has been previously reported, should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also draw the editor's attention to any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under review and any other published material of which they have personal knowledge.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES
Responsibilities of the corresponding author
The corresponding author (submitting) is solely responsible for communicating with Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines and managing communication between co-authors. Before submission, the corresponding author ensures that all authors are included in the list of authors, that its order has been agreed upon by all authors, and that all authors are aware that the paper has been submitted.
After acceptance, the proof is sent to the corresponding author, who deals with Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines on behalf of all co-authors; Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines will not necessarily correct errors after publication if they result from errors present in a proof which was not shown to the co-authors before publication. The corresponding author is responsible for the accuracy of all content in the proof, particularly that the names of co-authors are present and spelled correctly, and that addresses and affiliations are current.
Confidential process
Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines treats the submitted manuscript and all communications with authors and reviewers as confidential. Authors must also treat communication with the Journal as confidential: correspondence with the review, reviewers' reports, and other confidential materials must not be published on a website or otherwise made public without prior permission from the Editorial Office, whether the submission is ultimately published or not.
Reporting standards
Authors of original research reports must provide an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its importance. The underlying data must be accurately represented in the document. A document should contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to reproduce the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable .
Data access and retention
Authors are asked to provide raw data related to an article for editorial review, and must be prepared to provide public access to such data (in accordance with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and must, in any case, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and plagiarism
Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original works and, if authors have used the work and/or words of others, this has been properly cited or cited.
Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in journals other than Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable .
Source recognition
Proper recognition of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the work reported.
Authors of the paper
Authorship should be limited to those who made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are other individuals who participated in some substantial aspect of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and accepted its submission for publication.
Human or Animal Dangers and Subjects.
If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that present unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author should clearly identify these in the manuscript.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors must declare in their manuscript any financial or other substantial conflicts of interest that could be construed as influencing the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his or her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor in retracting or correct the paper.
Reviewer Suggestions
Authors are not required to provide reviewers. If necessary, the editorial board will call on external reviewers.
CrossMark Policy Statement
CrossMark is an initiative by several CrossRef editors to provide a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of an article or other published content. By applying the CrossMark button, Éditions MA-ESKA undertakes to maintain the content it publishes and to alert readers of changes if and when they occur.
The Crossmark button gives readers quick and easy access to the current status of a content item, including any corrections, retractions, or updates to that record.
For more information about CrossMark, please visit the CrossMark website.
MA-ESKA Editions content that will have the CrossMark button is limited to current and future content of the review and is limited to specific publication types.
Correction and Retraction Policies
Editions ESKA is committed to preserving the integrity of the literature and issues Errata, Expressions of Concern, or Retraction Notices as the situation requires and in accordance with the COPE Correction and Retraction Guidelines. In all cases , these opinions are linked to the original article.
Information about COPE's Correction and Retraction Guidelines can be found here:
Membership / COPE Guidelines
Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines follows the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The review takes responsibility for applying rigorous peer review and strict ethical policies and standards to ensure that it adds high-quality scientific works to the field of academic publishing. Unfortunately, cases of plagiarism, data falsification, inappropriate author credit, and others may occur. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines takes these publishing ethics issues very seriously and our editors are trained to proceed in such cases with a zero-tolerance policy. To verify the originality of content submitted to our journals, we use similarity check to compare submissions with previous publications.
Backup method / Electronic preservation used
Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines uses the CLOCKSS system to create a distributed archival system among participating libraries and allows those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for preservation and restoration purposes.
