Legitimize your research by giving from meaning to paradoxes

Abstract

Among the many elements that shape the quality of an article, the rationale for the research question is
one of those that appear from the first lines. Many authors draw
in the introduction the catchphrase that "little or no work" would have,
to date been carried out on the precise subject that
the article proposes to investigate
or explore. This way of legitimizing
a search amounts to filling a void
("Gap") in terms of knowledge
theory available on the research object. So many theories and models in Information Systems have
so, been tested in contexts
diverse and varied, one can however wonder about the "self-sufficient" character
of argument. I am surprised at
read frequently, why research should be conducted "de facto" at
like the adage that nature has
horror of the void ...