CHAPTER 8 COVID-19: THE DANGER OF BLINDLY APPLYING THE “STEEPEST CURVE”

Authors

  • Achille IVASILEVITCH Laboratory of Business Law and New Technologies (DANTE) (UR4498), Paris-Saclay University (UVSQ), Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France. Department of Ethics and Scientific Integrity, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
  • Henri-Corto STOEKLÉ Department of Ethics and Scientific Integrity, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
  • Félix ACKERMANN Department of Internal Medicine, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
  • Antoine BIZARD Geriatric Unit, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
  • Christian HERVÉ Department of Ethics and Scientific Integrity, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France. University of Paris, Paris, France. International Academy of Medical Ethics and Public Health, University of Paris, Paris, France.

Keywords:

Disease outbreaks, Coronavirus

Abstract

Drawing lessons from the first wave of Covid-19, and the management of the pandemic by the French health authorities, this article questions the “steepest curve” argument –an argument that consists, in a situation of radical uncertainty, and by “precaution”, in systematically projecting the worst-case scenario. But, is this rationale of anticipating the worst that might happen pertinent for dealing with crises? This is not what practices teach us, by which gentler slopes, “average” slopes, discovered day by day in the light of experience, have emerged. This article therefore aims to defend another paradigm in the management of uncertainty: that of a phronesis, a prudence guided by practices.

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Achille IVASILEVITCH, Henri-Corto STOEKLÉ, Félix ACKERMANN, Antoine BIZARD, & Christian HERVÉ. (2021). CHAPTER 8 COVID-19: THE DANGER OF BLINDLY APPLYING THE “STEEPEST CURVE”. Journal International De bioéthique Et d’éthique Des Sciences, 32(4), 151. Retrieved from https://journaleska.com/index.php/jidb/article/view/8977

Issue

Section

Articles