Mixed methods in information systems research: epistemological and methodological challenges

Abstract

Mixed methods are increasingly popular in social sciences thanks to their ability to generate
new research results that differ from traditional methodologies. As such, because they
offer a wide range of methodological choices, these methods are fruitful for the Information
Systems domain (Mingers, 2001; Venkatesh et al., 2013). However, we do not have any knowledge
of how they are actually mobilized. The aim of this article is to better understand the
use of mixed methods by IS researchers. More specifically, based on a comparative literature
review, we identify trends in how these methods are used and in their epistemological
anchor. To do so, a bibliographic analysis of seven IS journals has been conducted over the
period 2008-2016. This analysis allows us to bring a critical lens on the use of mixed methods
in IS and thus completes the two bibliographical studies developed by Mingers (2001) and
Venkatesh et al. (2013). By anchoring its reflection in epistemology, this analysis differs from
previous ones, making it original and powerful. It allows us to propose recommendations
for authors wishing to implement this type of method.