Cultural diversity in nanotechnology ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54695/dss.54.05-06.2673Keywords:
Nanotechnology, Social control over science, Science, Technology, Cultural practices, Social representation, Language, Philosophy of sciences, Future of mankind, Health hazards, Europe, Western Europe, United States, Japan, Research policy, Human enhancement, Privacy, Government financing, Profits, Developing countries, Developed countries, Political systems, Debates, Relativism, Progress.Abstract
Along with the rapid worldwide advance of nanotechnology, debates on associated ethical issues have spread
from local to international levels. However, unlike science and engineering issues, international perceptions of
ethical issues are very diverse. This paper provides an analysis of how sociocultural factors such as language,
cultural heritage, economics and politics can affect how people perceive ethical issues of nanotechnology. By
attempting to clarify the significance of sociocultural issues in ethical considerations my aim is to support the
ongoing international dialogue on nanotechnology. At the same time I pose the general question of ethical relativism
in engineering ethics, that is to say whether or not different ethical views are irreconcilable on a fundamental level
