CONTINUOUS INNOVATION IN FACTOR CREDIT STRATEGIES

Authors

  • Patrick HOUWELING PhD, Co-Head of Quant Fixed Income, Robeco
  • Frederik MUSKENS CFA, Quant Researcher, Robeco
  • Robbert-JAN ‘T HOEN Quant Researcher, Robeco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54695/bmi.165.6707

Keywords:

Factor investing, corporate bonds, emerging markets, textual analysis, low-risk, quality, value, Momentum, size

Abstract

There is an large body of academic literature that documents the existence of factor premiums that enable investors to construct portolios that generate better risk-adjusted returns than passive investing. To ensure that such factor-based investment strategies continue to deliver on their objectives, continuous innovation is required, for example by further enhancing factor definitions and investment processes and investigating alternative sources of data. In this article we show two examples of recent innovations in the field of factor investing for corporate bonds.In the first study, we document how factors can be successfully applied to hard-currency emerging market credits. Size, low-risk, value and momentum factor portfolios outperform the emerging market credit universe on a risk-adjusted basis, for example shown by higher Sharpe ratios. A multi-factor portfolio moreover benefits from diversification between the individual factors and obtains the highest information ratio. The factor portfolios benefit from bottom-up allocations to countries as well as from bond selection within these countries. Analysing the break-even transaction costs shows that these factors remain attractive after taking transaction costs into account. While generic factors offer a good starting point, more complete risk-assessments limit the exposure to unrewarded risk.
In the second study, we extend previous research that showed that the text from annual and quarterly corporate reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission can be used to predict equity returns and volatility. We examine whether the text in these reports is informative for corporate bond returns and volatility as well. Particularly, we test if bonds of ‘non-changers’, companies with few changes in their reports over time, outperform bonds of ‘changers’. In a large sample of corporate bonds over a twenty year period we find that results for equities do carry over to corporate bonds: in both the investment grade and high yield sub-samples non-changers outperform changers by more than 50bps annually.

References

Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and

market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics,

(1), 3-18.

■ Bektić, D., Wenzler, J.-S., Wegener, M.,

Schiereck, D., & Spielmann, T. (2019). Extending

Fama–French factors to corporate bond markets. The Journal

of Portfolio Management, 45(3), 141-158.

■ Caporin, M., & Poli, F. (2017). Building news measures

from textual data and an application to volatility forecasting,

Econometrics, 5(3), 35.

■ Cohen, L., Malloy, C., & Nguyen, Q. (2020). Lazy

prices, The Journal of Finance, 75(3), 1371-1415.

■ Correia, M., Richardson, S., & Tuna, I. (2012).

Value investing in credit markets. Review of Accounting

Studies, 17(3), 572-609.

■ Dekker, L., Houweling, P., & Muskens, F. (2019).

Factor Investing in Emerging Market Credits, working

paper, ssrn.com/abstract=3457127

■ Dekker, L., & De Jong, F. (2021). Liquidity Pricing in

Emerging Market Corporate Bonds, working paper, ssrn.

com/abstract=3493243

■ Hering, J. (2017). The annual report algorithm: retrieval

of financial statement and extraction of textual information,

working paper, ssrn.com/abstract=2870309

■ Houweling, P., & Van Zundert, J. (2017). Factor

investing in the corporate bond market. Financial Analysts

Journal, 73(2), 100-115.

■ Ilmanen, A., Byrne, R., Gunasekera, H., &

Minikin, R. (2004). Which risks have been best rewarded?

The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(2), 53-57.

■ Israel, R., Palhares, D., & Richardson, S. (2018).

Common factors in corporate bond returns. Journal of

Investment Management, 16(2), 17-46.

■ Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying

winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market

efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91.

■ Jostova, G., Nikolova, S., Philipov, A., & Stahel,

C. (2013). Momentum in corporate bond returns. The Review

of Financial Studies, 26(7), 1649-1693.

■ L’Hoir, M., & Boulhabel, M. (2010). A bond-picking

model for corporate bond allocation. The Journal of Portfolio

Management, 36(3), 131-139.

■ Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2014). Measuring

readability in financial disclosures, The Journal of Finance,

(4), 1643-1671.

■ Picault, M., & Renault, T. (2017). Words are not all

created equal: A new measure of ECB communication,

Journal of International Money and Finance, 79, 136-156.

■ Tetlock, P., Saar-Tsechansky, M., & Macskassy,

S. (2008). More than words: quantifying language to

measure firms’ fundamentals, The Journal of Finance, 63:

-1467.

Published

2021-10-27

How to Cite

Patrick HOUWELING, Frederik MUSKENS, & Robbert-JAN ‘T HOEN. (2021). CONTINUOUS INNOVATION IN FACTOR CREDIT STRATEGIES. Bankers, Markets & Investors, 165(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.54695/bmi.165.6707

Most read articles by the same author(s)